Product Category Choice Decision
Choose a product category by checking the expectations each label creates against actual capabilities, buyer context and unresolved evidence.
Read this resource as Markdown
When to use this template
Use this when several familiar labels could describe the product and each would cause buyers to expect different workflows, competitors or capabilities. Bring actual buyer language and current product boundaries.
Choose another approach when: You want a fashionable category to disguise missing functionality, need a catchy slogan rather than a positioning decision, or have no evidence yet about the task and customer you intend to serve.
Gather these inputs
- Customer descriptions of the task and the alternatives they actually consider.
- Two or three plausible category labels with their implied buyer expectations.
- A verified capability and availability list, including important exclusions.
Copy and adapt the template
Edit the text below and copy it into your own document. Edits stay in this browser field and are not submitted or saved by this page.
Worked example
Illustrative example, not a Crany customer result. Replace every example detail with facts you can verify.
Fictional example: Handoff Notes could be called a project-management app or a client handoff checklist tool. “Project management” may suggest task assignment and ongoing team planning. The founder has evidence only for preparing a final client handoff, and has not built recurring team workflows. The broader label would create expectations the product cannot satisfy. The founder provisionally chooses “client handoff checklist tool”, records that this describes a limited pilot, and asks relevant designers to explain what they would expect it to do. If those readers still assume a full client portal, the description needs another check. The decision is a documented hypothesis, not evidence that the category has market demand.
How to use it
- Write the supported customer value and actual alternatives before brainstorming category names.
- List likely expectations for each candidate and mark the evidence behind those expectations.
- Choose a label with a defensible fit, test understanding and retain the unresolved assumptions.
Check before using it
- The decision is based on supported value rather than a category sounding larger or more fashionable.
- Important missing capabilities are not hidden by the chosen label.
- The worksheet chooses a category; a separate one-liner can express the resulting introduction.
What to measure
Look for recurring mismatches between the chosen label and relevant readers’ expectations, then inspect whether a narrower description resolves them. A category decision or a handful of interviews cannot establish category size, conversion uplift or product-market fit.
Research and sources
Dunford explains how category context creates expectations and follows alternatives, differentiated capabilities, value and customer fit. This comparison worksheet is an original application, not her proprietary methodology or a validated category-selection score.
- April Dunford: A Quickstart Guide to Positioning — checked 2026-10-24. Author’s 2021 explanation of buyer alternatives, differentiated capabilities, customer value and category expectations; no universal growth or numeric claims adopted.
About Crany
Crany is an AI marketing co-founder in development for software founders and vibe coders, designed to strategize, execute approved marketing and improve based on results. This free resource is usable independently of the product. Join the public waitlist.